It seems that I have failed to do so. Dang.
But wouldn't that be interesting? The concept of having a video for a title.
Having a video for title will, draw people's attention to the article.
Heck, even having a picture for title will help.
People never use it though. Probably because they would think that a title should encompass the contents of the article. Of course, a picture won't be able to exactly state what the article contains. However, isn't that the same for most titles? Unless the author is really down-to-the-earth, most titles aren't that boring. It often uses a similee or a maxim in order to express the overall feeling of that article.
Well, if that is the case, to give an overall feeling of that article, why can't a video or a picture do the same? Instead of having a title like "Death looks upon Africa", and talking about the poverty in Africa, why can't we have a simple picture like this as a title?
 |
| Kevin Carter's infamous photo |
Maybe I should try doing so on the final.
Wow...I never thought about putting videos for the title:)
답글삭제I remember using that photo for my Korean class SeongUn! It really shook my emotions, and you know what? Your idea of having a video or a picture for a title is really creative, and maybe even more efficient than words!!!
답글삭제Scary picture. Incredibly sad. Hard to look at, and hard to look away. Memorable to say the least. Beyond words.
답글삭제I'm not sure what this post is really about, and I have no time to watch the video now, but I like your extra writing and Soho's commenting.